Published Date: July 28th, 2024
SPECIAL ALERT REPORT
TRUTH /// AWAKENING /// DISCLOSURE
THE CONSPIRACY TO ASSASSINATE PRESIDENT TRUMP
“We delve into the alarming revelations surrounding the conspiracy to assassinate President Trump, examining every angle—from the purported planners and alleged multiple shooters to the stand-down orders and the subsequent cover-up. Our investigation seeks to uncover the layers of truth behind these new disclosures.”
THE PLAN • CONSPIRATORS • SHOOTERS • STAND-DOWN ORDERS • COVER-UP
The Conspiracy to Assassinate Special Report contains a comprehensive collection of extensive alternative and independent research links on the Trump Assassination attempt.
“This is a living document and will be updated on a weekly basis”
Welcome Truth Seekers
Welcome, Truth Seekers, to our new Special Report investigation into the alarming revelations surrounding “The Conspiracy to Assassinate President Trump”. This comprehensive report dives deep into a complex web of new disclosures involving all conspirators, designated shooters, purported stand-down orders, and a potential cover-up that may have followed. We explore every facet of the plot to assassinate, bringing to light a myriad of perspectives and scrutinizing the evidence (or lack thereof) behind these serious assertions.
Our investigation is structured meticulously to ensure an in-depth examination of all information available. Through detailed analysis of witness testimonies, leaked documents, and expert opinions, we aim to provide a thorough understanding of the events that took place. Join us as we navigate this labyrinthine narrative, committed to seeking out the truth in a case that has stirred significant controversy and public interest.
Once you’re familiar with the subtopic headings, begin the process of reviewing our detailed descriptions, video links, and related articles. Take your time—this report is designed to be reviewed multiple times to ensure a deep understanding of the material.
We have designed this report for easy navigation, allowing you to explore all the information seamlessly. Remember, this is an intuitive platform that will adapt to your intentions, and lead you through the content in a way that feels natural. Our goal is to assist you in Connecting the Dots to the plot to assassinate President Trump.
In the end its your discernment, critical thinking, and rational examination of all the evidence as to what you believe as truth.
List of Topic Headings
- The Assassination Attempt
- Assassination News Updates
- Assassination Shooter Evidence | Mapping Shooting | Witness Testimonies
- 3D Illustration & Bullet Trajectories
- Secret Service Bodycam & Witnesses
- Assassin Background, Reason Behind Assassination | Thomas Cooks Patsy
- Captured Government Agencies | Compromised Directors & Executive Officers
- Secret Service History & Background Review
- Identified Plot to Assassinate President
- Assassination Conspirators
- Identified Suspicious Individuals | Number of Shooters
- MK-Ultra Mind Control Technology
- Assassination Timeline
- Forensic Audio Rifle Shots Analysis
- Stand Down Orders
- Congressional Hearing | Director of FBI, Homeland Security & Secret Service
- State & Local Police Involvement | Perimeter Security
- DJT Assassination Visions, Prophecy’s & Predictions
- US Government Cover-Up | Deep State/Khazarian Mafia
A “Special Alert” is a notification issued by authorities, organizations, or media outlets to inform the public about an urgent or critical situation that requires immediate attention. These alerts are typically used to convey important information about emergencies, threats, or significant events that may impact public safety, security, or well-being.
Special Alerts can cover a wide range of scenarios, including natural disasters (such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods), public health emergencies (like disease outbreaks), security threats (including terrorist activities or criminal incidents), and other urgent situations (such as missing persons or severe weather warnings). The purpose of a Special Alert is to provide timely and accurate information, often including specific instructions or precautions that the public should take to protect themselves and others.
The content of a Special Alert usually includes a description of the situation, the areas affected, the actions being taken by authorities, and any recommended or mandatory steps for the public to follow. The information is disseminated through various channels, including television, radio, social media, mobile notifications, and official websites, to ensure it reaches as many people as possible.
In essence, a Special Alert serves as a critical communication tool to ensure public safety and preparedness in response to sudden and potentially hazardous situations.
The Assassination Attempt
The assassination attempt on Trump refers to an incident where an individual or individuals reportedly planned or attempted to assassinate Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States. Details and motivations behind the attempt varies, with some linked to DS political agendas, political discontent or mental instability of the perpetrators. These incidents underscore the intense security collapse and polarizing nature of politics in the US today, We look to review all sources seeking to expose the truth behind the assassination attempt.
Assassination News Updates 💢
Watch & share the most banned broadcast in the world that’s loaded with special guests and breaking intel …
- Assassination attempt on Donald Trump. (3:33)
- Possible deep state involvement in Trump assassination attempt. (9:28)
- Government corruption and cover-ups, with mentions of assass…
New Assassination Warnings
Assassination Shooter Evidence | Mapping Shooting | Witness Testimonies
Witness testimonies in the context of assassination shooter evidence refer to the accounts and statements given by individuals who observed or have knowledge about the assassination attempt. These testimonies are crucial in building a factual understanding of the events that transpired during the assassination attempt.
Witness testimonies can include a variety of details such as the physical appearance and actions of the shooter, the sequence of events leading up to and during the attack, and any interactions or suspicious activities observed before the attempt. These accounts are collected through interviews, depositions, or during court trials and are critical for law enforcement and legal teams to piece together the events accurately.
These testimonies help establish the identity and motive of the assailant and can provide insights into the planning and execution of the attack. They are vital for corroborating other forms of evidence, such as surveillance footage, forensic analysis, and ballistic reports. In high-profile cases like an assassination attempt, the reliability and credibility of witness testimonies are meticulously scrutinized, and they play a pivotal role in the judicial proceedings that follow an assassination attempt.
3D Illustration & Bullet Trajectories
Secret Service Bodycam & Witnesses
Assassin Background, Reason Behind Assassination | Thomas Cooks Patsy
The assassin’s background encompasses the personal history, characteristics, and previous behavior of the individual who attempts or succeeds in carrying out an assassination. This background includes factors like upbringing, education, psychological profile, political and social beliefs, and any past criminal activities.
Understanding an assassin’s background is crucial for identifying potential motives and predicting future threats. It helps law enforcement and security agencies develop profiles that may prevent similar incidents. The background often reveals a complex interplay of psychological, social, and ideological elements that drive the individual to commit such a violent act. This could involve grievances against the target, radical beliefs, mental health issues, or a desire for notoriety. Investigators thoroughly examine the assassin’s personal history, affiliations, and prior incidents to construct a detailed profile that aids in the investigation and prevention of future threats.
The reason behind an assassination refers to the motive or driving force that compels an individual to plan and execute the killing of a public figure, leader, or prominent individual.
The reasons behind an assassination are varied and can be rooted in political, social, religious, or personal motivations. Political motivations might include the desire to change the political landscape, remove a perceived tyrant, or disrupt political stability. Religious or ideological reasons may involve executing perceived divine or moral orders, or eliminating opposition to a particular belief system. Personal reasons could stem from psychological disorders, personal vendettas, or a misguided sense of justice. Understanding the motive is essential for comprehending the broader implications of the assassination, assessing the threat level, and implementing appropriate security measures to prevent similar occurrences.
Captured Government Agencies | Compromised Directors & Executive Officers
Captured government agencies refer to situations where regulatory or governmental bodies are dominated or influenced by the entities they are supposed to regulate or oversee, rather than serving the public interest. This capture can be the result of corruption, undue influence from lobbyists, or the revolving door phenomenon where former employees of industries take up roles in governmental agencies.
Agency capture occurs when the regulatory bodies tasked with enforcing laws and regulations in specific sectors begin to align more closely with the interests of the industries they regulate rather than the public. This can lead to weakened enforcement, biased regulatory frameworks, and policies that favor industry over public welfare. The capture can be facilitated through various means including but not limited to, financial incentives, political lobbying, and the promise of lucrative job opportunities in the private sector post-tenure in the public sector. Recognizing and addressing agency capture is critical to ensuring that government agencies function as intended to protect public interests rather than becoming tools for industry gains.
Compromised directors and executive officers refer to leaders within organizations—both public and private—who have been influenced, coerced, or corrupted by external pressures, conflicts of interest, or personal gains, thereby failing to uphold their fiduciary duties to the organizations they serve.
When directors and executive officers are compromised, it can significantly impact the integrity and operational effectiveness of an organization. These leaders may make decisions that benefit themselves or external parties rather than the organization and its stakeholders. Compromise can occur through bribery, extortion, personal relationships, or financial pressures that lead these executives to act in ways that are not aligned with the best interests of their organizations. This undermines trust and can lead to strategic missteps, financial losses, and a tarnished reputation. Preventing and managing such compromises involves strict enforcement of ethical standards, comprehensive oversight, and rigorous conflict-of-interest policies.
The Secret Service typically maintains a detail of around 20 to 30 agents for ex-presidents like Donald Trump, though this number can fluctuate depending on the situation. Closest to the principal, in this case, Trump, are teams of approximately 5 to 7 highly trained Secret Service agents. Within a 100-foot radius, known as the middle perimeter, there is usually a mix of Secret Service personnel and local law enforcement. An armored SUV or limousine is also stationed within this perimeter, ready for use in the motorcade and for pre-event screening.
In the outer perimeter, security is primarily managed by local law enforcement officers. In the Butler incident, the building from which the shooter climbed was technically outside the rally venue and had not been swept by the Secret Service. This oversight meant that the security plan was not fully implemented, and responsibility ultimately fell on the Secret Service.
Let’s outline the positions of all parties involved. The former president’s podium was central, flanked by three bleachers where a selected audience was seated. Behind them, the sniper team was positioned, divided into north and south teams located on three buildings. The Sniper Team North was stationed on the first building, while Sniper Team South was on the third building. Trees between the buildings provided some cover, limiting the visibility of the Secret Service Sniper Team North.
The shooter climbed a ladder to a vantage point, using a red dot magnification sight for accuracy. The shooter fired three bullets in a controlled manner. The first bullet struck President Trump on the ear and also hit an audience member in Bleacher 3. From a top-angle view, the bullet’s trajectory can be traced. Another two bullets were fired, with one hitting a tractor used as a makeshift array for speakers, causing a hydraulic machine to burst. The shooter then fired an additional 5 to 8 bullets, possibly in semi-automatic mode, one of which struck an attendee, resulting in a tragic loss. This summary maps out all the bullets fired during the incident.
- FBI's handling of evidence in an assassination attempt investigation.
Secret Service History & Background Review
Identified Plot to Assassinate President
Identified plots to assassinate a president refer to uncovered or revealed schemes and plans aimed at ending the life of a sitting president. These plots can be orchestrated by individuals, groups, or even state-sponsored entities and often involve detailed planning and covert operations.
Identifying and understanding plots to assassinate a president is critical for national security and the stability of a nation’s government. These plots are generally uncovered through intelligence gathering, law enforcement investigations, and sometimes through information provided by the public or insiders. Once a plot is identified, a thorough investigation is launched to understand the motivations, the methodology planned for the assassination, and the broader implications such as whether there are broader networks or supporters involved.
The reasons behind such plots can vary widely, including political ideologies, personal vendettas, or attempts to destabilize the government. Security agencies play a crucial role in not only preventing these plots from being realized but also in mitigating the conditions that give rise to such extreme measures. Enhanced security protocols, constant vigilance, and cooperation between various national and international security agencies are essential in preventing potential assassinations.
Understanding these plots also involves analyzing historical assassination attempts to identify common tactics or motivations, which can help in forecasting and preventing future attempts. The ultimate goal is to safeguard the president and, by extension, maintain the continuity and stability of the government.
Assassination Conspiracy
Assassination conspirators are individuals or groups who actively plan, support, or participate in the formulation of a scheme aimed at killing a prominent figure, typically for political, ideological, or personal reasons. These conspirators may include a wide range of actors from lone individuals to organized groups, and even, in some instances, state-sponsored agents.
The role of conspirators in an assassination plot involves various stages of planning, from initial conception to the logistical execution of the attack. These stages might include gathering intelligence on the target, acquiring weapons, devising the method of assassination, and planning the escape or cover-up. Conspirators often share a common goal or grievance that unites them in their cause, whether it is to change political directions, retaliate for perceived injustices, or destabilize a particular power structure.
Assassination conspiracies require significant secrecy and trust among the conspirators, as discovery could lead to arrest and failure of the mission. The motivations behind such conspiracies can vary greatly but often stem from deep-seated dissatisfaction with the target’s actions, policies, or mere existence in a specific role of power.
Understanding the network and dynamics among assassination conspirators is crucial for law enforcement and security agencies. It helps in predicting potential threats, uncovering ongoing plots, and taking preventive measures to protect high-profile targets. Moreover, studying these conspiracies provides insights into the political and social environments that foster such extreme actions, potentially guiding efforts to address underlying issues and reduce the likelihood of such events.
Identified Suspicious Individuals | Number of Shooters
Identified suspicious individuals refer to persons who have been marked by law enforcement or security agencies as potentially dangerous or threatening based on specific behaviors, actions, communications, or associations that align with profiles known to pose risks to public safety.
The identification of suspicious individuals is a critical component of preventative security measures. It involves continuous monitoring, data analysis, and intelligence gathering to ascertain any threat these individuals might pose. The process includes observing unusual behaviors, tracking communications, and understanding connections to broader networks or groups that have a history of violence or criminal activities. Security agencies use a combination of on-the-ground surveillance, digital tracking, and public tips to keep tabs on such individuals, aiming to preempt any harmful actions.
“Number. Shooters” refers to the specific count or identification of individuals involved in executing a shooting incident, particularly in scenarios where there is an attack or assassination attempt.
Knowing the number of shooters involved in an incident is crucial for response and containment strategies during and after a shooting event. This information helps law enforcement coordinate their response, manage the scene, and ensure public safety more effectively. It also aids in the investigative process, as identifying all involved parties is essential for a thorough understanding of the motives, methods, and potential for further attacks. Accurate identification and counting of shooters involve a mixture of eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage, forensic analysis, and cross-referencing with known suspects or suspicious individuals.
MK-Ultra Mind Control Technology
MK-Ultra was a covert and illegal CIA project that started in the early 1950s and officially halted in 1973. The program was designed to develop and test drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, with the aim of weakening the individual to force confessions through mind control.
MK-Ultra involved a series of experiments on human subjects, many of whom were unaware they were participating. The experiments were often conducted without the subjects’ consent as part of the CIA’s broader effort to manipulate mental states and alter brain functions. The techniques included the administration of psychoactive drugs (like LSD), hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, and various forms of torture.
The goal of MK-Ultra was to explore various methods of information gathering and psychological manipulation, which could be used against Soviet bloc enemies and other national security threats. However, the project often tested the boundaries of ethical human experimentation, leading to numerous controversies surrounding human rights abuses and assassinations.
The existence of MK-Ultra was first brought to public attention in 1975 through investigations by the Church Committee of the U.S. Congress and a presidential commission known as the Rockefeller Commission. The public outrage over the ethical and legal violations in MK-Ultra led to stricter regulations on human experimentation and greater oversight of covert operations.
Despite the official conclusion of MK-Ultra, the disclosures related to the program have fueled ongoing debates and conspiracy theories about the extent and continuation of government-sponsored mind controlled assassination programs. The legacy of MK-Ultra has become a significant example of the dark side of governmental research and the lengths that governments might go to harness control over the human mind.
Assassination Timeline
An assassination timeline is a chronological sequence of events leading up to, during, and following an assassination attempt. It includes key dates, times, locations, interactions, and actions that detail how the event was planned and executed, as well as the immediate aftermath.
Creating an assassination timeline is crucial for law enforcement and investigators to understand the sequence of events and identify potential lapses in security or missed warning signs. This timeline provides a detailed framework that helps in piecing together the motives, methods, and opportunities that led to the assassination attempt. It also serves to streamline the investigative process by pinpointing critical moments when intervention could have been possible or when additional evidence may have been generated.
Here’s a general outline of what an assassination timeline might include:
- Pre-Planning Stage:
- Initial discussions or ideation about targeting the individual.
- Formation of the plan and recruitment of conspirators.
- Acquisition of necessary tools and weapons.
- Preparation Stage:
- Surveillance and tracking of the target’s movements and habits.
- Rehearsals or dry runs.
- Final adjustments to the plan based on gathered intelligence.
- Execution Stage:
- Deployment of assassins to the location.
- Execution of the assassination attempt.
- Immediate escape and evasion actions by the perpetrators.
- Aftermath:
- Initial response by law enforcement and emergency services.
- Securing the scene and gathering preliminary evidence.
- Public and media reaction.
- Investigation:
- Collection of forensic evidence.
- Witness interviews.
- Analysis of surveillance footage and other digital trails.
- Resolution:
- Identification and apprehension of suspects.
- Legal proceedings such as trials and sentencing.
- Implementation of corrective measures to prevent future incidents.
By documenting every aspect of the assassination process, the timeline helps uncover the orchestration behind the attempt and provides insights that may prevent future occurrences. This tool is invaluable in the broader context of understanding political violence and the security measures necessary to protect high-profile individuals.
1)We Corrected Most of the Mistakes regarding the Position of the Shooter, 2)Added How the Secret Service Failed to stop the Shooter after 2 Minutes
Building a detailed picture of exactly how law enforcement reacted before and immediately after shots were fired.
Forensic Audio Rifle Shots Analysis
Forensic audio analysis of rifle shots involves the scientific examination and evaluation of sound recordings that capture gunfire to determine characteristics such as the type of firearm used, the number of shots fired, the sequence of events, and potentially the location of the shooter. This process is a crucial part of crime scene investigations involving gun use.
Forensic audio analysis typically uses advanced technology to analyze audio recordings for distinctive sounds associated with rifle shots. Analysts can examine various acoustic features, including the amplitude, frequency, and time intervals between shots, to make determinations about the specifics of the gunfire:
- Type of Firearm: Different firearms have unique acoustic signatures. Experts can often determine the make and model of the firearm used by analyzing the sound of the gunfire.
- Number of Shots: By identifying the distinct sound peaks that represent each gunshot within an audio file, analysts can accurately count the number of shots fired during an incident.
- Shooter Location: Using techniques like acoustic triangulation, analysts can estimate the location of the shooter based on how the sound of the shots changes across different recording devices placed at various points around the scene.
- Sequence of Events: Detailed analysis can reveal the timing and order of shots, which is crucial for reconstructing the sequence of events during the shooting. This information can help determine whether there was more than one shooter and the manner in which the incident unfolded.
- Echo and Reverberation Analysis: Understanding how sound reverberates in a recorded environment can provide clues about the physical characteristics of the location, aiding in recreating the scene.
Forensic audio analysts work closely with other forensic specialists and law enforcement officers to integrate audio analysis with ballistic, forensic, and eyewitness reports, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the crime. This method is particularly useful in cases where visual evidence is limited or non-existent. By piecing together these acoustic clues, experts contribute significantly to the investigative process, offering insights that are often pivotal in legal proceedings.
The evidence of this sound analysis demonstrates just two weapons. 8 shots from Crooks and a single counter-sniper shot. The track of the bullet and the radiating soundwaves have been animated here for easy visualization and making sense of, overlaid over the recreated 3D environment of the rally.
Stand Down Orders
A “stand down” order is a directive given to halt or delay a planned military action, police operation, or any other tactical activity. In the context of security and emergency response, it instructs personnel to temporarily cease their activities or hold their positions instead of engaging or continuing with an operation.
Stand down orders can have significant implications, especially when they involve situations of high tension or potential conflict. These orders may be issued for a variety of reasons:
- Strategic Reevaluation: New information or changes in the situation may require a reassessment of the planned action. Commanders or officials might issue a stand down order to prevent actions that could exacerbate the situation or prove unnecessary based on the latest intelligence.
- De-escalation: In conflicts or confrontations, stand down orders may be used to de-escalate tensions and reduce the risk of violence. This is particularly common in law enforcement or peacekeeping operations where the goal is to minimize harm and encourage peaceful resolution.
- Safety Concerns: If there’s a sudden risk to personnel or civilians—such as an unanticipated threat or a hazardous environment—a stand down order can preserve safety until the risk is mitigated.
- Coordination Issues: Operational complexities, such as the need for better coordination among different units or the integration of multiple forces, might also prompt such orders.
- Political or Diplomatic Considerations: Sometimes, broader political or diplomatic factors necessitate halting military operations, especially if continuing could affect international relations or lead to broader conflicts.
- Purposely Supporting an Assassination Attempt: this has far reaching ramification of a conspiracy or plot to assist in an active assassination attempt.
Stand down orders are critical in managing the conduct of military and security forces, ensuring that actions taken are timely, appropriate, and safe for all involved. However, the timing and context of these orders are often scrutinized, especially if they impact the effectiveness of operations or lead to negative outcomes. In some controversial cases, the issuance or alleged issuance of stand down orders has led to debates and investigations to determine their justification and impact on the events that unfolded.
Congressional Hearing | Director of FBI, Homeland Security & Secret Service
A congressional hearing involving the Director of the Secret Service is a formal meeting or session conducted by a congressional committee to question, review, and assess the activities and policies of the U.S. Secret Service. The Director of the Secret Service is summoned to testify, providing insights and explanations regarding various aspects of the agency’s operations. In this case the attempted assassination of President Trump.
Congressional hearings are crucial oversight tools used by the U.S. Congress to monitor government agencies, ensure accountability, and inform legislative decisions. When the Director of the Secret Service is called to a hearing, it typically covers several key areas:
- Operational Review: The Director may be questioned about the overall operational effectiveness of the Secret Service, including the protection details provided to national leaders, their families, and visiting dignitaries. This also includes the security measures in place at the White House and other critical infrastructure.
- Policy and Procedure Updates: The hearing may seek clarification on any new policies or significant procedural changes within the Secret Service. This could involve the implementation of new security technologies, changes in protection protocols, or updates following security breaches or lapses.
- Budget and Resource Allocation: Congress might scrutinize the budgetary requirements of the Secret Service, discussing resource allocation, funding adequacy, and financial management within the agency.
- Incidents and Responses: Any recent incidents or controversies involving the Secret Service are likely topics of discussion. The Director must explain how such situations were handled and what steps are being taken to prevent future occurrences.
- Future Challenges and Plans: The hearing provides an opportunity for the Director to outline future challenges the Secret Service expects to face and the strategies planned to address these issues.
These hearings not only hold the Director accountable but also provide transparency to the public regarding the activities and challenges of the Secret Service. They play an essential role in ensuring that the agency remains effective in its mission to protect national security and its leaders.
State & Local Police Involvement | Perimeter Security
State and local police involvement in perimeter security refers to the role that these law enforcement agencies play in establishing and maintaining secure boundaries around a specific area or during an event. This involves strategic planning, deployment of officers, and collaboration with other security agencies to prevent unauthorized access and ensure public safety.
Perimeter security is a critical component of the broader security measures implemented for protecting sensitive locations, large public events, or during heightened security alerts. The involvement of state and local police is essential due to their jurisdictional authority and familiarity with local environments. Here’s how they typically contribute:
- Planning and Coordination: State and local police work in conjunction with federal agencies, private security firms, and event organizers to develop comprehensive security plans. This includes risk assessments, determining the layout of the perimeter, and identifying potential vulnerabilities.
- Physical Barriers and Monitoring: They are responsible for setting up physical barriers such as fences, barricades, and surveillance systems. Police also monitor these barriers using patrols, cameras, and other surveillance technologies.
- Access Control: Officers manage access points to ensure that only authorized personnel and attendees can enter. This involves checking credentials, conducting searches, and managing the flow of people and vehicles into and out of the area.
- Emergency Response: State and local police are prepared to respond to any security breaches, disturbances, or emergencies within the perimeter. They coordinate with other emergency services to manage such situations effectively.
- Crowd Control: In cases of large public gatherings, police enforce laws and maintain order, ensuring that the event proceeds safely for all attendees.
- Post-Event Assessment: After the event or the need for heightened security has concluded, police often conduct assessments to identify what went well and what could be improved for future security operations.
State and local police are integral to effective perimeter security, providing not only the manpower needed to enforce security measures but also the local knowledge and authority crucial for swift and effective response to any incident. Their involvement ensures a layered and comprehensive approach to public safety and security.
DJT Assassination Visions, Prophecy’s & Predictions
The topic of DJT assassination visions, prophecies, and predictions involves various claims made by individuals or groups who believe they have foreseen or foretold a potential assassination attempt on former President Donald J. Trump. These visions or prophecies are often presented as spiritual or intuitive insights, coming from a variety of sources such as psychics, religious figures, or self-proclaimed prophets.
These predictions can be based on perceived divine revelations, symbolic interpretations of current events, or personal beliefs about the former president’s role and destiny. While some proponents consider these prophecies as warnings or guidance, skeptics view them as speculative or baseless. The interpretations and significance of these predictions can vary widely, often reflecting the personal and cultural contexts of those who believe in them. It’s important to approach these topics critically and consider the source and positive nature involving an Act of God in the failure of the assassination attempt.
US Government Cover-Up | Deep State/Khazarian Mafia
A “US Government cover-up” refers to actions taken by government officials to hide, deny, or obscure illegal, unethical, or embarrassing information or events from the public. This term generally implies a deliberate effort to withhold information or mislead citizens about matters that may impact public opinion or trust in government institutions.
Government cover-ups can occur at various levels and involve different branches of government. The motivation behind these cover-ups often stems from a desire to avoid accountability, prevent scandal, protect the careers of individuals involved, or maintain national security. Cover-ups may involve:
- Suppression of Information: Withholding documents, redacting sensitive information beyond necessity, or refusing to comply with information requests under freedom of information laws.
- Misleading Statements: Providing false or misleading statements to the media, public, or other government bodies.
- Destruction of Evidence: Physically destroying, altering, or hiding evidence that could lead to government or individual liability.
- Intimidation or Silencing: Threatening whistleblowers, journalists, or insiders who are aware of the true circumstances with legal action, coercion, or worse, to prevent them from revealing damaging information.
- Manipulation of Investigations: Influencing, obstructing, or halting investigative processes that could uncover detrimental information about government actions or policies.
Historical examples of US government cover-ups include the Watergate scandal, which ultimately led to President Nixon’s resignation, and more recent allegations around various governmental departments concealing information related to surveillance practices, military operations, or judicial misconduct.
The discovery of such cover-ups often results in public outrage, a demand for transparency, and calls for accountability, sometimes leading to official inquiries, resignations, and policy changes. Cover-ups can significantly undermine public trust in government, stressing the importance of transparency and ethical conduct in public service.
The Great Awakening; Eyes to See, Ears to Hear, and Hearts to Know
The 3 C’s of Life: “Choices, Chances, and Changes”,
You must make a choice to take a chance or your life will never change. – Zig Ziglar
DISCLAIMER: All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by The Great Awakening Report (GAR) as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by GAR, those who work with GAR, or those who read or subscribe to GAR. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you, the reader, to substantiate. Any actions taken by those who read material on this site are solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think for yourself and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE: The information, including but not limited to text, graphics, images, and other material contained on this website, are for informational purposes only. No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or treatment and before undertaking a new health care regimen, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.
Copyright Disclaimer: The citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Community Guidelines Disclaimer: The point of view and purpose of this report is not to bully or harass anybody but rather to share that opinion and thoughts with other like-minded individuals curious about the subject.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: GREAT AWAKENING TEAM
DISCLAIMER: All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by The Great Awakening Report (GAR) as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader.Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by GAR, those who work with GAR, or those who read or subscribe to GAR.Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate.Any actions taken by those who read material on this site are solely the responsibility of the acting party.You are encouraged to think for yourself and do your own research.Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
COMMUNITY GUIDELINES DISCLAIMER: The points of view and purpose of this video is not to bully or harass anybody, but rather share that opinion and thoughts with other like-minded individuals curious about the subject.
About the Author: Great Awakening Team
DISCLAIMER: All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by The Great Awakening Report (GAR) as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader.Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by GAR, those who work with GAR, or those who read or subscribe to GAR.Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate.Any actions taken by those who read material on this site are solely the responsibility of the acting party.You are encouraged to think for yourself and do your own research.Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
COMMUNITY GUIDELINES DISCLAIMER: The points of view and purpose of this video is not to bully or harass anybody, but rather share that opinion and thoughts with other like-minded individuals curious about the subject.
